SustainabilityXpress Beta: The Benefits & Challenges of talking Green & Technology

This release onto SolidWorks’ Labs web-site is something┬áDASI been looking forward to since the team behind gave a sneak peak at SolidWorks World back in January. What it represents is a partnership between SolidWorks and an organization called PE International, an expert in sustainability and materials science. The end result is looking to be a set of tools, starting with part-only Xpress variant, then a fuller fledged assembly analysis tools coming on stream and presumably into the Office Premium bundle and sold as a separate product.

What the tools do is interrogate your part’s form, its size then requests additional information such as material (if you haven’t got it set in the part file), the manufacturing process. The system filters based on your material selection – for example, selecting a plastic, you get Injection Moulded and Extruded as options. It then asks for geographic information, asking for details on where your part is manufactured and where it’s in use. Rather oddly, the system currently only has three geographic “regions” – Europe, North America, Asia and Japan.

This is then used to hook into PE’s huge database (available in a system called ) of materials lifecycle information and gives you all manner of results for environment issues. There are four or five panels that give you information about the environmental impact of sourcing the material, processing it, shipping it and it being in use and of course, in these Cradle to Grave times, it’s end of life disposal. The key metrics the systems gives you relate to Carbon footprint, Energy Consumed (over the complete lifecycle of the product), Air Acidification (which covers the emissions such as sulfur dioxide and nitrous oxides) and Water Eutrophication (pretty much the contamination of water and resultant damage to the surrounding ecology).

The four panels that show the key environmental factors and comparison between the original and new material selection.

The system has a set of baseline tools, that allow you to select your starting material, perhaps your initial guess or the material used in a previous generation of a part, zero out the values, then use the tools within the system to find alternatives and very quickly and very graphically see how the various values improve or degrade. The thing that interests me is the Find Similar tool that’s used to find those alternatives. As a massive advocate of materials science and the use of materials selection techniques in design and engineering, this tool holds some promise. In basics, it presents you with a set of selection criteria in which to search the underlying database to find alternative that have the same material characteristics.

A basic set of materials search options are available to find alternative materials.

All the usual things are there including material class (alloys, plastics etc etc), density, thermal expansion, yield strength, elastic and shear moduli, tensile and yield strengths, Poissons ratio. You can then set limits to those values such Greater than, Less than, Approximate (rather disappointingly there’s no range-based search) and search the database to find materials than match your criteria.

A list of alternatives that match your search criteria are presented and can be evaluated against your current material selection.

The tool then presents you with a list of alternative materials which you can then gauge the difference in relation to those environmental factors graphically and make a decision upon. What’s interesting of course, is that while you’re unlikely to make a material selection based on environmental factors alone, you can do so with an informed idea of how ‘green’ those alternatives are, then explore further. Using simulation to test the performance of new potential material.

The process you’ve been through can be documented and distributed using an automatically generated report (created from within the panel) that outputs to Word and gives you the basic starting point for a report proper. The report is also saved in the Design Binder and as such is associated with the part file. Personally, I think using Word to generate these things is a bad idea (preferring a HTML or PDF document) – particularly as I didn’t have Office install on my workstation.

The report is stored within the Design Binder folder within the SolidWorks part file – or can be output as a Word Doc.

What I like about this, even though it’s at a very early stage is a two fold thing. Firstly, there’s the simple fact that these issues, addressed by the tool, are going to become more and more of an issue in the coming years, as materials become more scarce, as governmental and international legislation cracks down as resources dry out and the simple fact that as designers, we have a moral obligation that the products we produce minimize the harm to the environment. By giving SolidWorks users the tools to quickly evaluate these factors, at an early stage, nothing but good can come of it.

Exerpted from Develop3D magazine.

This entry was posted in Product News. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.